Background<back to top>
Administrators and teachers at Athens Academy, an independent
co-ed day school located in northeast Georgia, began an intensive
long-term initiative to integrate media into the lives of their
students in 1990. Known as the Media Across the Curriculum Project
(MACP), this project, supported by the Bertelsmann Foundation,
has received international acclaim for its achievements. This
innovative project has recently moved into its final phase. This
phase, which is scheduled to last from June 1999 until June 2003,
focuses on the integration of portable technologies (e.g., NEC's
Compact Edition (CE) and PC laptops) into the teaching and learning
environment at Athens Academy.
In preparing for the portable technologies initiative at Athens
Academy, Keith and Smith (1997) prepared an initial review of
the use of laptop programs in other schools, nationally and internationally.
According to this report, laptops are selected for use in the
schools for two reasons: to act as a catalyst for changes in the
curriculum, and to integrate technology into an existing curriculum.
Athens Academy already has a strong curriculum that includes many
technology and media components, but the need for continual improvement
is acknowledged by the entire Academy community. As a result,
this institution is well positioned for bringing portable technologies
into its teaching and learning environment.
A primary focus of the MACP is the infusion of technology across
the curriculum. The vision established in the rationale for laptop
technologies focuses on creating "
a 'toolset' that could be effectively
used in almost every curriculum area" and could be used anywhere,
anytime to facilitate writing, communication, and resource use
(Keith & Smith, 1997). By providing each teacher and student with
portable technology that can assist them in their day-to-day tasks
and communication, it is believed that the anywhere, anytime goal
will soon be a reality.
This belief in anywhere, anytime learning is a goal shared by
others, and in fact, the Academy is not the first independent
school to decide to integrate laptops into their curriculum. Rockman
(1998) reported on a laptop program pioneered by Microsoft and
Toshiba American Information Systems to integrate portable technologies
into the classrooms in 29 schools throughout the United States.
According to Rockman, "the pilot program was designed to demonstrate
that providing every student within a classroom with access to
"real world" business tools would produce substantial educational
benefits by supporting learning anytime and anywhere" (p. 3).
Rockman's evaluation provides evidence of significant learning
effects as well as student and teacher accomplishments in skill
development, applications of technology for schoolwork, and improved
critical thinking.
The Evaluation Initiative <back to top>
Aware of the laptop successes (and challenges) documented at other
schools, Athens Academy recognizes that moving forward with the
final phase of the MACP project requires strong evaluation. In
the summer of 1999, faculty in the Department of Instructional
Technology at The University of Georgia were contacted by technology
leaders at Athens Academy to conduct a long-term evaluation of
the use of portable technologies in their school. The evaluation
will be both formative and summative. It will be formative in
describing the implementation of the various components of the
MACP laptop initiative into the overall teaching and learning
environment, including the community beyond the school campus,
with a goal of providing information that can be used to improve
the implementation. It will be summative in providing evidence
of the effects of portable technologies throughout Athens Academy.
In short, the primary purposes of this evaluation are to optimize
and document the impact of portable technologies on teaching,
learning, and other aspects of life within the Athens Academy
community.
Questions<back to top>
In order to have the information needed to guide decisions related
to the laptop initiative, many questions must be addressed. Many
new questions will be revealed during the evaluation itself, but
several questions can be posed in advance:
Methods<back to top>
This evaluation is a longitudinal one intended to last four years
(1999-2003). Several descriptive and interpretive methodologies
will be used to assist the evaluators in gathering data to answer
the questions posed above as well as other questions that will
surely surface during this time. A multiple case study design
will be used in this project (Yin, 1994). The unit of study will
be a combination of cohorts (e.g., 7th graders at the Academy)
and individuals. Individual learners and teachers will be selected
for in-depth examinations of the use and impact of portable technologies
at the Academy. Multiple cases will be compared to identify similarities
and differences between related cases. This methodology increases
understanding by assisting evaluators in identifying patterns
via repetition (Miles & Huberman, 1994).
Several instruments will be used to gather data to address the
various evaluation questions. These include surveys, questionnaires,
observations, and interviews. The researchers will also analyze
various documents generated by the students and teachers participating
in the evaluation (e.g., test scores, writing samples). Multiple
resources will be used to enable triangulation and cross-checking
of findings (Bogdan & Biklen, 1992).
An inductive approach will be used to analyze the data (Hill &
Hannafin, 1997). While specific questions have been posed to guide
the evaluation, no hypotheses will be formed prior to data collection
and analysis. Rather, the evaluators will let the data guide the
patterns and themes generated (Patton, 1990). Such an approach
is intended to yield a rich and meaningful portrayal of the implementation
and impact of this innovative program.
In addition to this inductive approach, the evaluation data will
also be analyzed within the context of several theoretical and
practical frameworks. For example, the Hooper-Rieber Model of
Technology Adoption in the classroom will provide one theoretical
lens for examining the data as will other models emerging from
scholars around the globe (Hooper & Rieber, 1995). In addition,
various guidelines for technology integration proposed by professional
associations such as the International Society for Technology
in Education (ISTE) and the CEO Forum will be used in the analysis.
Proposal Authors<back to top>
Janette R. Hill, Assistant Professor, The University of Georgia,
and Thomas C. Reeves, Professor, The University of Georgia, prepared
the proposal with information provided by two members of the Athens
Academy staff, T. Mark Keith, Director of Media and Technology,
and Caroline Ridlehuber, Director of Curriculum and Instruction.
Additional planning assistance was provided by Professor Michael
J. Hannafin, Director of the Learning and Performance Support
Laboratory (LPSL) at The University of Georgia. Dr. Hannafin has
directed prior evaluation projects at Athens Academy (see, for
example, Hannafin & Hawkins, 1998).